Closed portsmouth closed 11 months ago
I disagree as I think the name "blended_coat_emission_edf" is unclear and reads ambiguously (is it a "blended-coat" emission EDF, or a blended "coat emission EDF"? In fact neither of those make sense anyway, the emission is not from the coat but just affected by it) .
The meaning of the node is the final EDF for the surface, and that this involves the coat absorption is a matter for the EDF to compute downstream. I'd rather we don't tie ourselves to historical, unclear names just for the sake of consistency with an old model.
We should account for the opacity of the fuzz_layer here as well (i.e. the emission will be dimmer if passing through a layer of fuzz). Though in the OpenPBR spec we don't propose a formula for that (yet).