Closed sgbaird closed 1 year ago
For example:
Suggestion from @stanlo229:
Use "building construction" (ποΈ) or "inbox tray" (:inbox_tray:) (maybe preference towards ποΈ).
So this would look like:
Or:
Following up on this, I think a benefit of ποΈ over π¦Ύ is that π¦Ύ may be more likely to be confused with a different topic than sample transfer, e.g., automation in general.
Some other thoughts:
/
as a separator?|
I think I like this one the best.
I prefer it at the beginning. It aligns better and doesn't run the risk of getting broken across the page.
I think I like βοΈ or π§ the best. βοΈ seems more neutral without the red, but still has a pretty clear meaning. π§ implies more of an "under construction" (meaning it might be or could be implemented in the future), but I think the interpretation is more ambiguous than βοΈ.
@stefanbringuier, @stanlo229, and @kiranvad, curious to get your thoughts on this.
I'm leaning towards this configuration.
Category | Emoji |
---|---|
Synthesis | π§ͺ |
Characterization | π¬ |
Sample transfer | ποΈ |
Experiment planning | π» |
Manual intervention | βοΈ |
@sgbaird I love what youβve done here. My favourite has to be the same emojis but I prefer β/β as the separator because β|β reminds me too much of the βorβ symbol in logic / code. β/β makes it look like itβs different parts. Perhaps even β>β could be a separator because it points to the next stage of the SDL?
@sgbaird I really like this! Here is my take on some.
Category | Emoji |
---|---|
Fully-Auto sample transfer | :robot: |
Semi-Auto sample transfer | :mechanical_arm: + :mechanic: |
Manual sample transfer | :hand: |
So an entry with semi-auto behavior, would look like:
For experimental planning, I could also see using :bar_chart: or :calendar:, but :computer: is better.
5 got me thinking about this. There are examples where human intervention is very minimal or only a single step (e.g., transferring a sample) that I want to include.
I've been thinking about how I can either restructure or modify the presentation to capture this.
This got me thinking about emojis, similar to the starred lists that I use.
While the following are applicable, it doesn't allow for any in-between.
:mechanical_arm: vs. :muscle: π€ vs. :adult:
If there were clearly defined levels of autonomy like with cars we could put the number :one: :two: ...
We could also clarify which aspects are autonomous. Some possible categories and emoji are:
So fully autonomous might look like: :test_tube:/:microscope:/:mechanical_arm:/:computer:
Maybe partial would be: :test_tube:/:microscope:/:x:/:computer: