Closed VladimirAlexiev closed 1 year ago
The UK will generally follow RIBA stage - so I think relating to a standard is a good idea - but each pilot may wish to relate to a different standard
Yes, would be good to link to a standard. We don't have such a thing so far. @AmnaKRDB please keep a note to explore this at least for the UK. We would need to ask other countries how they deal with this.
The RIBA stages are RIBA_ConceptDesign RIBA_Construction RIBA_DevelopedDesign RIBA_HandoverandCloseout RIBA_InUse RIBA_PreparationandBrief RIBA_StrategicDefinition RIBA_TechnicalDesign
Just a note to say not every project should adopt these - so we need to have the flexibility for this to be exentsible.
See https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Comparison_of_standard_project_plans_used_in_the_construction_industry for some comparisons
The permitting_stages have been now related to standards as well using the property aec3po:hasPermittingStage, which is equivalent to dicl:hasStage. the dicstg: has been used to define the list of standards.
Our
permitting_stages
are related to a territory (eg UK), but not to a standard. If I understand correctly, this is only an example, not an exhaustive list. https://github.com/Accord-Project/aec3po/blob/5fb6f7e2b8b9f0f208caeeab68461aa8b3c0dfcd/src/vocabularies/permitting_stages.ttl#L9-L15https://digitalconstruction.github.io/Stages/v/0.5/ (
dicstg:
) defines stages according to some standards:BS_EN_16310, HOAI, ISO_22263, RIBA
. In particular there isBS_EN_Regulatory_approval, HOAI_BuildingPermissionApplication
. Should we relate our stages to standards and/or DiCon stages?cc @beachtom