Closed sudoAlphaX closed 4 months ago
This PR was a mistake. I had wrongly assumed that the package manager used it Lazy, but i didnt notice the use
keyword, isntead of return
used my Lazy.
Hence, I closed this PR.
But if the keyword for dependencies in the package manager used in the example (I think it is packer, I could be wrong), Ill be happy to reopen this PR.
Edit: just realised that i had made so many typos. It was late at night, and i was sleepy. For the second sentence, i meant that if the keyword for dependencies
of the package manager in the current example, had to be changed, then i'd reopen the PR.
Oh! I made the same mistake now :P Yeah indeed this plugin was written prior to lazy.nvim
and assumed packer
. It's not ideal that this is not specified in the README though. If you would want to update the instructions to use lazy.nvim
I'd be happy with that!
I'd be glad to do that. Will open a PR after adding a snippet for Lazy package manager, and also an example config for activate.nvim.
-------- Original Message -------- From: Axel Dahlberg @.> Sent: 29 May 2024 8:16:57 pm UTC To: "AckslD/nvim-neoclip.lua" @.> Cc: Alpha @.>, Mention @.> Subject: Re: [AckslD/nvim-neoclip.lua] change requires to dependencies for auto-installation in neovim (PR #122)
Oh! I made the same mistake now :P Yeah indeed this plugin was written prior to lazy.nvim
and assumed packer
. It's not ideal that this is not specified in the README though. If you would want to update the instructions to use lazy.nvim
I'd be happy with that!
-- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/AckslD/nvim-neoclip.lua/pull/122#issuecomment-2138192508 You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Message ID: @.***>
--
sudoAlpha
Sent from my Android device using K-9 Mail
@sudoAlphaX sorry for a very late reply. Would you want to reopen this again?