v2.0.0 - Sorting options missing and ambiguous

[theshillito]

"Order By" used to have "Product Title", "Purchase Date", etc. Now it's replaced by an ambiguous "Descending" and "Ascending" selection, which seems to be product release date, and that's the only option. Old style can be seen in https://github.com/AcrylicShrimp/dlsite-manager/blob/main/docs/img-list.png

Could the older sort options be added back in please (I always had it as order by purchase date, since anything I just bought should be at the top). In the interim, this could be better labelled to say what is being ordered.

[AcrylicShrimp]

Let me explain some:

1. Old style order-by filter is gone, because many fields of product table are removed. This is needed to support indexing "not-owned" products, since DLsite is not giving much product informations for "not-owned" compared to the "owned" ones.
2. So currently, there is only one field that can be used for order-by filter, is "purchased date" field. The order-by filter after reworking is using this.
3. But I think the order-by filter behavior is somewhat broken.

Conclusion:

• Let me fix the order-by filter to correctly sort products by purchased date.
• But I'm not sure I can restore previous filter options. If you really need sort options other than "purchased date", let me know, I'll consider to re-implement them.

[theshillito]

"purchased date" is really all I want, and the removal of the other sort options makes sense due to lack of data.

For the "not-owned" products, if no "purchased date" is available, is the intention to use folder "creation date" or "modified date" perhaps?

[AcrylicShrimp]

Ah, there was an error in my comment. Currently products are sorted by "registered at", not "purchased date". I'm sorry.

I'll change it to use "purchased date" in next release. And yes, I think I can use ctime or atime for "not-owned' ones. Which do you prefer? I think ctime is typically set by the product maker, so it's better to use atime maybe.