ActivitySim / activitysim

An Open Platform for Activity-Based Travel Modeling
https://activitysim.github.io
BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License
194 stars 99 forks source link

potential performance improvements #377

Open bstabler opened 3 years ago

bstabler commented 3 years ago

This issue is for keeping track of potential performance improvement ideas:

Please add other ideas, thanks

jpn-- commented 3 years ago

A configuration file switch that can disable trip-level processing for tours based on tour mode. So, you can shut off (skip) stop_frequency, trip_purpose, trip_destination, trip_scheduling, and trip_mode_choice for walk and bike tours if you don't care about those trips (e.g. inside a global feedback loop iteration, I don't care about walk or bike trips as they don't impact congestion).

Bonus points: the ability to easily flop the switch the other way, and re-start only the filtered tours (e.g. I decided I finished doing all my global feedback loops and I want those non-motorized trips back now)

bstabler commented 3 years ago

@stefancoe - add reading skim data from disk on-demand as opposed to reading every skim into RAM at the start as a way to trade runtime for RAM. @toliwaga implemented an undocumented version of this during the TVPB caching research and it runs slower but uses a lot less RAM. We may want to complete this feature for general use.

bstabler commented 3 years ago

Some more ideas from discussions with SANDAG:

stefancoe commented 3 years ago

Some good ideas here to increase pandas performance. The Pandas eval function looks interesting. Could it replace/substitute python eval in some cases?

jpn-- commented 3 years ago

Could it replace/substitute python eval in some cases?

Not that we couldn't do it more, but we're already using pandas.eval in several places, for example:

stefancoe commented 3 years ago

Oh good to know-Thanks for pointing that out!