Open AnthonyLeonardoGracio opened 7 years ago
As a single record, yes. But the information is there, split in several flows:
Thanks for the precision. We already have PayloadMass in F_PT's inputs, should it be removed if the two rotactors are given explicitely?
That’s also an interesting point for the lessons learnt. It depends on “who” codes the two rotactors?
Is it CP, because it has a small micro-processor? In that case MMS does not need to receive the two rotactors, and my interfaces were right.
Or is CP purely electro-mechanical, and F_PT.F_CM has two receive the two rotactors to compute PayloadMass=10*Rotactor1 + Rotactor2.
I postpone my final answer, but option 1 is the most likely.
De : Claire Dross [mailto:notifications@github.com] Envoyé : jeudi 22 juin 2017 14:21 À : AdaCore/RESSAC_Use_Case Cc : Ledinot Emmanuel; Assign Objet : [Message publicitaire : ] Re: [AdaCore/RESSAC_Use_Case] AV_CP_Switches listed in F_CM inputs but not in F_PT inputs (#3)
Thanks for the precision. We already have PayloadMass in F_PT's inputs, should it be removed if the two rotactors are given explicitely?
— You are receiving this because you were assigned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/AdaCore/RESSAC_Use_Case/issues/3#issuecomment-310363752, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AVVweAxg7lv8Ob4JLVZQzN0KrXlVfVeVks5sGlwzgaJpZM4N_XYH.
OK, and then with option 1 F_PT.F_CM still needs to compute the values of each rotactors to store them in its output to GS named CP_Switches ?
Yes. Even with a computerized CP (a smart CP ☺), it would not be in charge of repeating its statuses to GS. MMS is the control center, and F_CM is in charge of broadcasting datas wherever needed, after elaboration by the control center. So in option 1, you are right, the rotactors’ values would be “reconstructed” by F_CM since they would not be acquired by analog links to the rotactors.
De : Claire Dross [mailto:notifications@github.com] Envoyé : jeudi 22 juin 2017 18:07 À : AdaCore/RESSAC_Use_Case Cc : Ledinot Emmanuel; Assign Objet : Re: [AdaCore/RESSAC_Use_Case] AV_CP_Switches listed in F_CM inputs but not in F_PT inputs (#3)
OK, and then with option 1 F_PT.F_CM still needs to compute the values of each rotactors to store them in its output to GS named CP_Switches ?
— You are receiving this because you were assigned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/AdaCore/RESSAC_Use_Case/issues/3#issuecomment-310426766, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AVVweJ2jqU95DJuanIYD_jxbN7VUVx6Sks5sGpE7gaJpZM4N_XYH.
Document: UseCaseDevelopment/Layer1_MMS/RESSAC_muXAV_SystemRQ_MMS_SW_Incr1.doc Commit: 74aa074811487
La sous-fonction F_CM attend AV_CP_Switches en input mais celui-ci n'est pas listé dans les inputs de la sous-fonction englobante F_PT.