Open setton opened 5 years ago
Hi Nico!
I think your RFC proposes a practical fix to the occurrence of a general issue we have in Ada wrt. operator visibility.
I however wonder if we shouldn't try and address the forest behind the tree here.
Stil in favor of this anyhow. Will put that up for discussion!
A problem that I see today with that change, is that it will be very hard to make it affect only one version of Ada, since we can't say:
% if Ada_Version = 202X then
type Count_Type is ...
% else
type Count_Type is ...
% endif;
So while I like that proposal, I think it's unimplementable right now. Curious to know what other people think.
Link to text: https://github.com/setton/ada-spark-rfcs/blob/master/considered/rfc-change-count-type-to-natural.rst