Hello, I appreciate the excellent alternative you've provided for the data-driven Impulse response.
Upon reviewing the code base of the lp_lin() function, I discovered that it relies on Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) for computing the impulse response. However, I'm curious if there's a possibility of employing a different model, such as Random Forest or GAM, to calculate standard errors and subsequently generate impulse responses.
I would greatly appreciate it if you could let me know if this is feasible, and if so, kindly share any helpful tips or insights for implementing this approach. Thank you.
Why would you want to compute the standard errors via Random Forests? The theoretical properties of OLS are well known, which is why the package also sticks to this approach.
Hello, I appreciate the excellent alternative you've provided for the data-driven Impulse response.
Upon reviewing the code base of the lp_lin() function, I discovered that it relies on Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) for computing the impulse response. However, I'm curious if there's a possibility of employing a different model, such as Random Forest or GAM, to calculate standard errors and subsequently generate impulse responses.
I would greatly appreciate it if you could let me know if this is feasible, and if so, kindly share any helpful tips or insights for implementing this approach. Thank you.