use RangeInclusive constructor rather than literal syntax to avoid missing is_empty error

AdamNiederer / base100

base💯 - Encode your data into emoji

GNU Affero General Public License v3.0

275 stars 17 forks source link

use RangeInclusive constructor rather than literal syntax to avoid missing is_empty error #8

Closed stuarth closed 6 years ago

stuarth commented 6 years ago

RangeInclusive has an is_empty field that was missing from the literal syntax in these tests, and it's also no longer behind a feature flag. Fixes both of these issues!

AdamNiederer commented 6 years ago

Looks like the build failure isn't our fault. Thanks a bunch!