Closed vigen-b closed 8 months ago
Thanks for submitting this. I think the code is correct, spot on in fact. :) I'm checking if it's perhaps happening at the wrong place.
This change will resolve ignored users being unintentionally deleted from a user group, which is fine, though perhaps this check should happen sooner to avoid ignored users being added to a group too. I'll check what happens if your amendment is positioned at line 1874 instead, just after the check for built-in user names, as these two checks are often paired up. You could be completely correct where it already is though.
Seems it's better idea, at least user skipping would be handled in one place.
Description
Fix for #40
What's Changed