Open SukkaW opened 11 months ago
can you make a normal traceroute including the latency?
can you make a normal traceroute including the latency?
traceroute to 94.140.14.49 (94.140.14.49), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
1 * * *
2 10.60.0.1 (10.60.0.1) 1.360 ms 1.352 ms 1.325 ms
3 te0-4-0-4-8.202.ccr21.hkg02.atlas.cogentco.com (154.18.8.37) 2.140 ms 2.309 ms 2.289 ms
4 be2923.ccr31.sin01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.87.225) 32.960 ms 37.780 ms 32.654 ms
5 datacamp.demarc.cogentco.com (154.18.17.2) 33.714 ms 33.710 ms 154.18.33.74 (154.18.33.74) 32.261 ms
6 vl223.sgp-eq3-dist-2.cdn77.com (185.156.45.99) 40.475 ms vl221.sgp-eq3-dist-1.cdn77.com (185.156.45.95) 35.451 ms 40.290 ms
7 * * *
8 * * *
9 * * *
10 * * *
11 * * *
12 * * *
13 * * *
14 * * *
15 * * *
16 * * *
17 * * *
18 * * *
19 * * *
20 * * *
21 * * *
22 * * *
23 * * *
24 * * *
25 * * *
26 * * *
27 * * *
28 * * *
29 * * *
30 * * *
@ijuliank
can you make a normal traceroute including the latency?
traceroute to 94.140.14.49 (94.140.14.49), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 * * * 2 10.60.0.1 (10.60.0.1) 1.360 ms 1.352 ms 1.325 ms 3 te0-4-0-4-8.202.ccr21.hkg02.atlas.cogentco.com (154.18.8.37) 2.140 ms 2.309 ms 2.289 ms 4 be2923.ccr31.sin01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.87.225) 32.960 ms 37.780 ms 32.654 ms 5 datacamp.demarc.cogentco.com (154.18.17.2) 33.714 ms 33.710 ms 154.18.33.74 (154.18.33.74) 32.261 ms 6 vl223.sgp-eq3-dist-2.cdn77.com (185.156.45.99) 40.475 ms vl221.sgp-eq3-dist-1.cdn77.com (185.156.45.95) 35.451 ms 40.290 ms 7 * * * 8 * * * 9 * * * 10 * * * 11 * * * 12 * * * 13 * * * 14 * * * 15 * * * 16 * * * 17 * * * 18 * * * 19 * * * 20 * * * 21 * * * 22 * * * 23 * * * 24 * * * 25 * * * 26 * * * 27 * * * 28 * * * 29 * * * 30 * * *
@ijuliank
i dont see why this is needed, its around 40/50ms?
can you make a normal traceroute including the latency?
traceroute to 94.140.14.49 (94.140.14.49), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 * * * 2 10.60.0.1 (10.60.0.1) 1.360 ms 1.352 ms 1.325 ms 3 te0-4-0-4-8.202.ccr21.hkg02.atlas.cogentco.com (154.18.8.37) 2.140 ms 2.309 ms 2.289 ms 4 be2923.ccr31.sin01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.87.225) 32.960 ms 37.780 ms 32.654 ms 5 datacamp.demarc.cogentco.com (154.18.17.2) 33.714 ms 33.710 ms 154.18.33.74 (154.18.33.74) 32.261 ms 6 vl223.sgp-eq3-dist-2.cdn77.com (185.156.45.99) 40.475 ms vl221.sgp-eq3-dist-1.cdn77.com (185.156.45.95) 35.451 ms 40.290 ms 7 * * * 8 * * * 9 * * * 10 * * * 11 * * * 12 * * * 13 * * * 14 * * * 15 * * * 16 * * * 17 * * * 18 * * * 19 * * * 20 * * * 21 * * * 22 * * * 23 * * * 24 * * * 25 * * * 26 * * * 27 * * * 28 * * * 29 * * * 30 * * *
@ijuliank
i dont see why this is needed, its around 40/50ms?
In the meantime, Cloudflare & NextDNS are having a latency at 0.7ms at my end. Better CDN resolution as well.
We don't mind adding Hong-Kong, but we'll only do that after adding India (hopefully in Q1 2024). All new locations are postponed until it happens.
We don't mind adding Hong-Kong, but we'll only do that after adding India (hopefully in Q1 2024). All new locations are postponed until it happens.
Understandable. Thanks very much!
+1 A server in HongKong would also benefit Vietnam, China, Taiwan... Connection from Vietnam (especially North Vietnam) to HongKong is usually better and stable than to Singapore. https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdGuardDNS/issues/631
Issue Details
Proposed solution
Adding a new server location in Hong Kong.
Alternative solution
No response