Closed x-rated closed 1 month ago
I have the same result with and without AdGuards (CPU - Ryzen 7800x3d)
@x-rated, hello! I don't see the difference either.
i tried clean install of adguard with same settings, but still 25% lower ๐ can i download version 5.0.42 somewhere? ๐ค
@x-rated Here's 5.0.43 https://uploads.adguard.org/chrome-mv3_v5.0.43-beta.zip and this is 5.0.49 https://uploads.adguard.org/chrome-mv3_v5.0.49-beta.zip
@alexx7311 thank you for sharing the links
for me last version without performance loss is 5.0.43 ๐ค 5.0.49 is already slow as 5.0.57 something definitelly went wrong there after 5.0.43 ๐ my cpu is i9-9900K
i used these settings in all versions:
{"protocol-version":"2.0","general-settings":{"allow-acceptable-ads":false,"show-blocked-ads-count":true,"autodetect-filters":true,"safebrowsing-enabled":false,"filters-update-period":-1,"appearance-theme":"system"},"extension-specific-settings":{"use-optimized-filters":false,"collect-hits-count":true,"show-context-menu":true,"show-info-about-adguard":false,"show-app-updated-info":true,"hide-rate-adguard":false,"user-rules-editor-wrap":false},"filters":{"enabled-filters":[2,3,4,5,11,17,18,19,20,21,22,105,208,255,256,257],"enabled-groups":[0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7],"custom-filters":[],"user-filter":{"enabled":true,"rules":"","disabled-rules":""},"allowlist":{"enabled":true,"inverted":false,"domains":[],"inverted-domains":[]}},"stealth":{"stealth-disable-stealth-mode":false,"stealth-hide-referrer":false,"stealth-hide-search-queries":true,"stealth-send-do-not-track":true,"stealth-block-webrtc":false,"stealth-remove-x-client":true,"stealth-block-third-party-cookies":true,"stealth-block-third-party-cookies-time":2880,"stealth-block-first-party-cookies":false,"stealth-block-first-party-cookies-time":4320,"block-known-trackers":true,"strip-tracking-parameters":true}}
with 5.0.49 and later i notice little lags during the test progress - always in first thirds of each segment ๐ค approximately marked in the screenshot bellow (except for the first segment which is always laggy even without adguard)
after a bit of testing, i managed to reach full score 20+ points in 5.0.57 ๐ฎ it has something to do with these settings ๐ค
i had to turn all these switches off and restart the anonymous window i was testing in ๐ค but it is weird - when i turn off only couple of them, there was always same low score -25% ๐ค
these are my new settings for better performance
{"protocol-version":"2.0","general-settings":{"allow-acceptable-ads":false,"show-blocked-ads-count":false,"autodetect-filters":true,"safebrowsing-enabled":false,"filters-update-period":-1,"appearance-theme":"system"},"extension-specific-settings":{"use-optimized-filters":false,"collect-hits-count":false,"show-context-menu":false,"show-info-about-adguard":false,"show-app-updated-info":false,"hide-rate-adguard":false,"user-rules-editor-wrap":false},"filters":{"enabled-filters":[2,3,4,5,11,17,18,19,20,21,22,105,208,255,256,257],"enabled-groups":[0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7],"custom-filters":[],"user-filter":{"enabled":false,"rules":"","disabled-rules":""},"allowlist":{"enabled":false,"inverted":false,"domains":[],"inverted-domains":[]}},"stealth":{"stealth-disable-stealth-mode":false,"stealth-hide-referrer":false,"stealth-hide-search-queries":true,"stealth-send-do-not-track":true,"stealth-block-webrtc":false,"stealth-remove-x-client":true,"stealth-block-third-party-cookies":true,"stealth-block-third-party-cookies-time":2880,"stealth-block-first-party-cookies":false,"stealth-block-first-party-cookies-time":4320,"block-known-trackers":true,"strip-tracking-parameters":true}}
screen recordings from testing - you can notice that "bad score" video is twice longer + those lags in first thirds of segments at the bottom i mentioned earlier ๐ค
probably it should be enough to disable only "help with adguard filters development" setting
@maximtop thats it ๐ฎ this is the only switch which slows down the performance after 5.0.43 โ ๏ธ i didnt test all possible combinations before, just randomly these "for me not so important" features ๐
@x-rated This is expected because it involves a resource-intensive operation. When this setting is enabled, the AdGuard script traverses all elements to determine which ones are being blocked, which can impact performance.
Please answer the following questions for yourself before submitting an issue
AdGuard Extension version
5.0.57
Browser version
128
OS version
Windows 11 24H2
Ad Blocking
AdGuard Base filter, AdGuard Mobile Ads filter
Privacy
AdGuard Tracking Protection filter, AdGuard URL Tracking filter
Social
AdGuard Social Media filter
Annoyances
AdGuard Cookie Notices filter, AdGuard Popups filter, AdGuard Mobile App Banners filter, AdGuard Other Annoyances filter, AdGuard Widgets filter
Security
Online Malicious URL Blocklist, Phishing URL Blocklist, Scam Blocklist by DurableNapkin, uBlock Origin โ Badware risks
Other
AdGuard Experimental filter
Language-specific
EasyList Czech and Slovak
What Tracking protection options do you have enabled?
Block trackers, Remove tracking parameters, Hide your search queries, Ask websites not to track you, Hide Referrer from third parties, Remove X-Client-Data header
Issue Details
Steps to reproduce:
Expected Behavior
results should be the same
Actual Behavior
with the newer version results are poor (-25% in my case)
Screenshots
5.0.57
![68747470733a2f2f63646e2e616467756172642e696e666f2f736974657265706f7274732f313472683676747666396b306767777734347773676b77343873773834346b656a386c6163726f7279672e706e673f6e633d31](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b06835be-3542-42a0-be25-9b4ac5184885)adguard disabled, performance similar to 5.0.42 (or 49, not sure)
![68747470733a2f2f63646e2e616467756172642e696e666f2f736974657265706f7274732f35383178326a726d746a386b73343830636f6b6b636f773067636367736330366c357232337963676f772e706e673f6e633d31](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6bca766a-219d-4234-acae-97c8bc8b1a3b)ublock origin lite mv3 for comparison
![ublock](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e1489f67-f614-4633-8545-e8f9babbdbe5)Additional Information
No response