superlex
commented
9 months ago Some additional thoughts. As more and more browsers support :has() native pseudo-class, maybe best solution is to add all rules having :has() to android-content-blocker/filters/*.txt lists with the syntax ##, like explained in the wiki:
Rules with the :has() pseudo-class should use native implementation of :has() if they use ## marker and if it is possible, i.e. with no other extended selectors inside.
In this way no additional code would be necessary for ContentBlocker, furthermore other browser having a (basic) built-in adblock can take advantage of android-content-blocker/filters/*.txt lists, for example Vivaldi. This is not a priority for AG, of course, but it could prove beneficial in the future.
References https://github.com/AdguardTeam/ExtendedCss#extended-css-has https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/:has https://caniuse.com/css-has
223047
Prerequisites
Please answer the following questions for yourself before submitting an issue. YOU MAY DELETE THE PREREQUISITES SECTION.
Problem Description
Recent versions of Chromium support :has() CSS selector, AG Content Blocker supports it as well. Btw, AG Content Blocker recognizes only this syntax:
example.org##body > div > p:has(>a)and it works like a charm. However, it should recognize this syntax too:example.org#?#body > div > p:-abp-has(>a)example.org#?#body > div > p:has(>a)Proposed Solution
1) Change AG Content Blocker behavior in order to recognize the correct syntax; 2) Update android-content-blocker/filters/*.txt lists adding AG filters that use :has() css selector .
Alternatives Considered
Update android-content-blocker/filters/*.txt lists adding AG filters that use :has() css selector, using syntax recognized by Samsung Internet.
Additional Information
Android 13 - One UI 5 Samsung Internet 22.0.6.9 AG Content Blocker 2.7.2