Open DandelionSprout opened 2 years ago
One week later: https://github.com/AdguardTeam/FiltersRegistry/commit/c96128eb41778f3a60c13e1a75bcc0f9001b1494
It remains to be seen if the new definition of $all
is extended to CSP.
AdGuard's filter counting mechanism shows much smaller (x5) numbers anyway:
Filter ID: 232
Filter name: KAD - Anti-Scam
Compiled rules: 41303
Excluded rules: 184
uBo: used 205 942 from 205 942
This is a bit of a fringe scenario, although it's been tested out with success in Dandelion Sprout's Annoyances List, but it could become useful for you guys at some point in the future:
When an entry uses
$all
, uBlock Origin counts that entry as 5 entry points in their dashboard settings, one for each of [no $ value] +$popup
+$document
+$inline-script
+$inline-font
.However, it turns out that this can be reduced to 3 points by changing
$all
to$all,~inline-script,~inline-font
, especially since https://github.com/AdguardTeam/FiltersRegistry/blob/master/filters/exclusions.txt implies that AdGuard Filters was never designed with$inline-script
and$inline-font
in mind anyway.For example, AdGuard Base Filter's uBO list version is currently shown in uBO as having 65,694 entries ±500. Had all its 235
$all
entries been converted to$all,~inline-script,~inline-font
, then the number would've gone down to circa 65,224 ±500. Though this would not be a big enough difference to make that list seem any more compact, and that it'd actually take up more filespace, it'd become a big deal if any of your lists' amount of$all
entries entered the 4-digits.