Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
Thanks for catching this, I thought I had removed that already. It'll be gone
in the next rev. Is there any issue that you can see why we don't go back to
v2.1 method of how you handle EEPROM? I'm not sure why EEPROM map was
stretched out the way it was.
Original comment by CaranchoEngineering@gmail.com
on 25 Jul 2011 at 2:42
It is even worse. At the start of the transmitter calibration, you send just 6
pairs of 1;0;, at the end you send 8 pairs of values. You have to send also 8
pairs at the start.
The 'O' command caused a receiver buffer overflow on my STM32 port, the buffer
was just 64 bytes long. Have to check how large the arduino buffer is...
Original comment by al...@arcor.de
on 25 Jul 2011 at 2:50
The arduino RX buffer is 128 bytes long, so there should be no problem with
longer messages.
Original comment by al...@arcor.de
on 25 Jul 2011 at 2:56
>Is there any issue that you can see why we don't go back to v2.1 method of how
you handle EEPROM? I'm not sure why EEPROM map was stretched out the way it
was.
A loop can still be used, but it looks a bit different now, as the offsets are
handled with a structure definition now. I send you the loop code later today.
Original comment by al...@arcor.de
on 25 Jul 2011 at 5:18
OK, before I make another release I'll update the development branch in GitHub
and send you a link. I'd appreciate your Eagle eye to do a quick look through
before I do another beta release. THANK YOU!
Original comment by CaranchoEngineering@gmail.com
on 25 Jul 2011 at 6:11
Updated commands for M & O to use LASTCHANNEL.
Original comment by CaranchoEngineering@gmail.com
on 25 Jul 2011 at 6:13
Here are the updated files which use loops to access the receiver slope, offset
and smooth factor EEPROM data, which makes the binary ~800 bytes shorter.
Original comment by al...@arcor.de
on 25 Jul 2011 at 11:16
Attachments:
Currently I can not test the last change, so make a transmitter calibration and
check if it is ok.
Original comment by al...@arcor.de
on 25 Jul 2011 at 11:26
Implemented, needs test
Original comment by CaranchoEngineering@gmail.com
on 26 Jul 2011 at 5:51
Original comment by CaranchoEngineering@gmail.com
on 28 Jul 2011 at 7:30
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
al...@arcor.de
on 25 Jul 2011 at 1:33