Closed djrochford closed 5 years ago
I thought this had already been done; we are already using this field in Earl. Thankfully, Earl doesn't check the schema -- otherwise things would be broken. In any case, we need to bring the schema in line with what is intended.
I thought this had already been done; we are already using this field in Earl. Thankfully, Earl doesn't check the schema -- otherwise things would be broken. In any case, we need to bring the schema in line with what is intended.