Closed rkraneis closed 2 months ago
Scammers have been reported. Maybe @chriswhocodes can close the comments, if GitHub doesn't get to it, first ...
Scammer comments removed. I'll take a look at your issue.
Kinds regards,
Chris
Thank you for the quick reaction. Just some more datapoints:
Regarding the ValuePolicy; it seems from the stack trace above that THROW
is used (WeakHashMap.java#L584). Very puzzling.
-Djava.util.WeakHashMap.valueKeyRetention=SOFT
makes it work. I guess the JavaDoc doesn't reflect reality yet and the EA is more aggressive.
The issue therefore is actually invalid.
C1 / Level 3 assembly is found; C2 / Level 4 is probably just not generated by EA.
Hi @rkraneis I'm glad you resolved your issue.
Do you happen to have any simple self-contained Valhalla code you could contribute as a sandbox example [1] to JITWatch?
Most of the communication I've had recently regarding JITWatch is people trying out Valhalla.
Kind regards,
Chris
[1] https://github.com/AdoptOpenJDK/jitwatch/tree/master/core/src/main/resources/examples
Hey @chriswhocodes I will see what I can polish up; including the "official" examples from the JEP might be the most interesting right now.
Seems to be a JavaFX issue? Still wonder why this happens, as WeakHashMap should use the SOFT ValuePolicy by default ...