Consider adding either Commercial or Open Source identifiers

[TheCakeMonster]

When looking at this fantastic list of work people have submitted, it's not easy to see what is commercial work requiring the purchasing of a license, and what has been gifted to the community through open sourcing. I think people would find a graphical segregation between these two helpful, as when people are building open source solutions it's problematic to include licensed components into the work.

If it's something that doesn't add too much overhead and maintenance, I think this is something worth considering.

[AdrienTorris]

Hi,

It's a good idea you're right. I'll think about how to display this information.

Thank's for the feedback!

[stsrki]

I also found this interesting. What about the projects that are open-source and have a commercial side for companies only? This is the case with Blazorise.

[AdrienTorris]

We could have 3 labels:

• Free
• Free for personal use
• Charged (is it the good term?)

[TheCakeMonster]

@AdrienTorris That's a good idea. 'Charged' is OK in UK English, but I wonder if 'Paid' is a better option for a wider audience whose first language may not be English?

[stsrki]

I agree that Paid is the better option.

[AdrienTorris]

Let's go for Paid :)