Closed elpiel closed 2 years ago
Merging #51 (2d91068) into main (04aada1) will increase coverage by
2.91%
. The diff coverage is74.87%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #51 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 82.64% 85.56% +2.91%
==========================================
Files 15 23 +8
Lines 1268 1247 -21
==========================================
+ Hits 1048 1067 +19
+ Misses 220 180 -40
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
src/lib.rs | 0.00% <ø> (-66.83%) |
:arrow_down: |
src/sentences/bod.rs | 0.00% <0.00%> (ø) |
|
src/sentences/mod.rs | 0.00% <0.00%> (-61.82%) |
:arrow_down: |
src/error.rs | 6.89% <6.89%> (ø) |
|
src/sentences/gnss_type.rs | 14.28% <14.28%> (ø) |
|
src/sentences/gbs.rs | 58.33% <58.33%> (ø) |
|
src/sentences/faa_mode.rs | 64.81% <64.81%> (ø) |
|
src/parse.rs | 82.35% <79.41%> (+19.11%) |
:arrow_up: |
src/sentences/gga.rs | 95.91% <80.00%> (ø) |
|
src/sentences/gsv.rs | 96.42% <80.00%> (+1.07%) |
:arrow_up: |
... and 16 more |
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.
@Dushistov would you like to take a look at the changes?
In general, it's much cleaner and I'm planning to do the Iterator parser soon.
There isn't much benefit in parsing the data as bytes because in many cases we turn it back to &str
and we know that NMEA 0183 sentences should be valid ASCII anyway, so the opposite parsing makes much more sense (&[u8]
-> &str
) only at the beginning of the parsing (i.e. using parse_bytes
)
&str
instead of&[u8]
parse_str
&parse_bytes
Support for 2 new message types: