Aethylred / puppet-blank

A blank puppet module suitable for submitting to Puppet Forge.
7 stars 1 forks source link

[request] Change license to the BSD license? #2

Open mwpher opened 10 years ago

mwpher commented 10 years ago

Hi,

Licensing your project under the GPL makes it illegal for anyone who forks it to license their modules under anything else but the GPL. This might make sense if you were concerned about having your life's work ripped off by a company, but since this is a template, wouldn't it be more natural to license it under a permissive license, since the template is just designed for anyone's purposes?

Personally, I'd like to license any modules that I make from this under the BSD license, since most of the modules I want to make are targeted for BSD.

Below, I've attached the unbelievably tiny text of the BSD two-clause license so you can see it.

Thanks, --Matt

Copyright (c) <YEAR>, <OWNER>
All rights reserved.

Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:

1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.

2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.

THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
Aethylred commented 10 years ago

I have been reconsidering re-licensing to MIT or Apache, but I've not spent time considering the options yet. The GPL worked better for my intentions than the Creative Commons I originally chose (which doesn't work correctly under New Zealand legislation).