There is a sequence diagram of an example flow on Orchestration landing page that seems outdated. In particular,
OrchLib seems to have been renamed.
provideOrchestartion is not use by the contract function explicitly rather is wrapped in a call to withOrchestration. Not sure if we want to keep it as is.
Anything else?
Also, if there is a way to reduce the overall size of the diagram, and/or increase the font size, that should help with readability. Perhaps we can remove AgoricNames?
There is a sequence diagram of an example flow on Orchestration landing page that seems outdated. In particular,
OrchLib
seems to have been renamed.provideOrchestartion
is not use by the contract function explicitly rather is wrapped in a call towithOrchestration
. Not sure if we want to keep it as is.Also, if there is a way to reduce the overall size of the diagram, and/or increase the font size, that should help with readability. Perhaps we can remove
AgoricNames
?