search

AgriculturalSemantics / cg-core

CG Core Metadata Reference Guide
https://agriculturalsemantics.github.io/cg-core/cgcore.html
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
7 stars 5 forks source link

Wider scope for cg.peer-reviewed #14

Open alanorth opened 4 years ago

alanorth commented 4 years ago

The current draft CG Core v2 schema recommends using cg.peer-reviewed with a boolean value "True" to indicate that a resource has been peer reviewed. CGSpace uses a non-standard Dublin Core field (dc.description.version) for this, with values such as "Peer Review" and "Internal Review". We refer to this field as "Review status" in our item submission and display user interfaces.

What do you think about expanding the scope of cg.peer-reviewed to include other types of review, and perhaps renaming the field to something more general like cg.review-status?

Cheers!

alanorth commented 4 years ago

Suggest we follow other DCTERMS examples and use camel case: cg.reviewStatus. What do you think, @marieALaporte?

ayabowork commented 4 years ago

I think this is better.

marieALaporte commented 4 years ago

sounds good to me

alanorth commented 4 years ago

@marieALaporte CGSpace currently uses the following values:

Also, I thought it might be better to follow naming convention of other DCTERMS / CG Core fields and use camel case: cg.reviewStatus. What do you think?

marieALaporte commented 4 years ago

Look at Nature review list for controlled terms

alanorth commented 4 years ago

@marieALaporte Where is that? I searched Google for "Nature review list" but couldn't find anything relevant. Thanks!

marieALaporte commented 4 years ago

Ryan mentioned yesterday during the meeting the recent Nature transparent peer review system (https://www.nature.com/documents/nature-transparent-peer-review.pdf) The change described in the issue were well accepted, by the group seen as an improvement. We were looking at possible externally maintained controlled list of terms that could be used for this. If if don't find any, we will publish our own, with our definitions of the terms. I was not able to find any list from Nature so far, but looked only quickly

alanorth commented 3 years ago

I updated the pull request in #23 to change cg.peer-reviewed to cg.reviewStatus, which incorporates the comments here.

alanorth commented 3 years ago

@marieALaporte should we add this to the v2.1 release also? Changing cg.peer-reviewed to cg.reviewStatus.

ayabowork commented 3 years ago

I think so, yes.