Closed yuki-nmi closed 4 months ago
I discussed with Gerard about this issue.
The correction for grassland was not added for ngw_nlv
, beuase the effect of landuse type is included in ngw_lea
already. For N run-off, land use effect is not included in other sub-indicators.
Problem: Soil total N is one of the sub-indictaors for the risk of N run-off (
nsw_nlv
) and risk of N leaching (ngw_nlv
).For the risk of N run-off, grassland has a correction term (i.e. if grassland, risk for N run-off is 0.5 point lower): https://github.com/AgroCares/BedrijfsBodemWaterPlanCalculator/blob/6bb696d50aa0248c4a4cb8c79dd1c2f0819f682a/R/bbwp_field_properties.R#L206
On contrast, grassland gets no correction for the risk of N leaching.
It seems more logical to assume that grassland has a positive effect on N leaching because of their intensive root system and therefore higher nutrient retention than arable crops. The effect of grassland on N run-off would be minor because water flows out before it enters the root zone.
Suggestion:
ngw_nlv
)nsw_nlv
)