The risk indicators for wet surroundings (D_NSW_WS and D_NSW_SLOPE) are reduced when wet surroundings are smaller than 20% and 10% (under the condition that slope is smaller than 1%).
This is now coded in bbwp_field_indicators.R, L. 106-125 as follows:
# minimize risks when there are no ditches around the field (wet surrounding fraction < 0.2)
# add criteria properties as column (to use as filter)
dt.melt[,WS := value[risk=='D_NSW_WS'],by='id']
dt.melt[,SLOPE := value[risk=='D_NSW_SLOPE'],by='id']
# ensure that the final risk after aggregation gets the value 0.1 or 0.01
dt.melt[WS <= 0.2 & SLOPE < 1 & group %in% c('NSW','PSW'), c('mcf','risk_cor','value') := list(1,1000,0.1)]
dt.melt[WS <= 0.1 & SLOPE < 1 & group %in% c('NSW','PSW'), c('mcf','risk_cor','value') :D_= list(1,1000,0.01)]
dt.melt[,c('WS','SLOPE') := NULL]
This is not an elegant way, because the resulting risk values are discrete. See figure below. (black line: slope < 1%, light blue: slope >= 1%).
Further, it is not nice to calculate this in the function to calculate indicator (bbwp_field_indicators). It's more consistent if the calculation is done in the function to calculate properties bbwp_field_properties.
Suggestion to improve
I suggest to change the equation inbbwp_field_properties as follows:
_the current equation(L.200 in bbwp_fieldproperties.R)
dt[,nsw_ws := pmin(1,pmax(0,D_SA_W))]
Suggested equation
dt[B_SLOPE_DEGREE >= 1, nsw_ws := pmin(1, pmax(0, D_SA_W))]
dt[B_SLOPE_DEGREE < 1, nsw_ws := pmin(1, pmax(0, 1.125 * D_SA_W - 0.125))] # this goes through point x = 0.2, y = 0.1
The risk indicators for wet surroundings (D_NSW_WS and D_NSW_SLOPE) are reduced when wet surroundings are smaller than 20% and 10% (under the condition that slope is smaller than 1%). This is now coded in bbwp_field_indicators.R, L. 106-125 as follows:
This is not an elegant way, because the resulting risk values are discrete. See figure below. (black line: slope < 1%, light blue: slope >= 1%). Further, it is not nice to calculate this in the function to calculate indicator (
bbwp_field_indicators
). It's more consistent if the calculation is done in the function to calculate propertiesbbwp_field_properties
.Suggestion to improve
I suggest to change the equation in
bbwp_field_properties
as follows:_the current equation(L.200 in bbwp_fieldproperties.R) dt[,nsw_ws := pmin(1,pmax(0,D_SA_W))]
Suggested equation dt[B_SLOPE_DEGREE >= 1, nsw_ws := pmin(1, pmax(0, D_SA_W))] dt[B_SLOPE_DEGREE < 1, nsw_ws := pmin(1, pmax(0, 1.125 * D_SA_W - 0.125))] # this goes through point x = 0.2, y = 0.1
Resulting risk values looks like this: