We might have to away from the Langmuir isotherm based on what we found out about filtering flocs and disrupting them can cause an increase in the probe's ability to pick up on fluoride, suggesting that the assumption the floc only binds onto a single site of fluoride from an adsorption site may not be correct. We are possibly looking at an ionic method of separation of fluoride from water and possibly literature review of how other papers show this separation may be a more accurate model of fluoride adsorption.
Throw in some lit review for this.
Also use a drawing file instead of a screenshot of the bottom geometry you were using from Maddy. Reach out to her please and ask her for access to her OnShape file if you will continue to use bottom geometry. A screenshot really does no justice to what the bottom geometry is or for a future team to recreate it.
Get all of your data into a python graph instead of the excel ones we currently have. Also follow along the team resources file to store data points themselves within python instead of excel as well.
Include the W term possibly within your results for figure 9 to possibly show how efficient your PACl was in removing fluoride and see if there is a trend between efficiency of your PACl and the % change in the concentration after filtering.
Also please show data of fluoride removal from experiments. I thought you had two good data points to fit the model I was hoping to see.
That's all folks, good job overall a few things to fix up but other than that it was a fun read.
Tigran
Hey guys good job again on this report.
We might have to away from the Langmuir isotherm based on what we found out about filtering flocs and disrupting them can cause an increase in the probe's ability to pick up on fluoride, suggesting that the assumption the floc only binds onto a single site of fluoride from an adsorption site may not be correct. We are possibly looking at an ionic method of separation of fluoride from water and possibly literature review of how other papers show this separation may be a more accurate model of fluoride adsorption. Throw in some lit review for this.
Also use a drawing file instead of a screenshot of the bottom geometry you were using from Maddy. Reach out to her please and ask her for access to her OnShape file if you will continue to use bottom geometry. A screenshot really does no justice to what the bottom geometry is or for a future team to recreate it.
Get all of your data into a python graph instead of the excel ones we currently have. Also follow along the team resources file to store data points themselves within python instead of excel as well.
Include the W term possibly within your results for figure 9 to possibly show how efficient your PACl was in removing fluoride and see if there is a trend between efficiency of your PACl and the % change in the concentration after filtering.
Also please show data of fluoride removal from experiments. I thought you had two good data points to fit the model I was hoping to see.
That's all folks, good job overall a few things to fix up but other than that it was a fun read. Tigran