UASB-Research Final Report Draft Comments

[ananya-gangadhar]

Do update the readme for UASB to contain links to all your reports. I’m happy to meet with you all and talk about using Python more effectively in your reports. Also include the ProCoDa parameters used for running your experiments. Remember, the goal of these reports is to facilitate transfer

• [x] Line 1: Your title isn’t formatted right.
• [x] Line 72: Why are your volume units m-3 instead of m3? Also, COD is measured in kg/m3.
• [x] Line 145: What new research? Cite all your claims to back it up.
• [x] Line 172: Kind of a non-issue but I think using UASB-R instead of the underscored version looks more technical.
• [x] Line 254: I’m not sure what purpose the code serves here besides just documenting the results. I think the idea of implementing the Python analysis was to use it for calculations, so I would recommend using it for your volume calculations. Also use comments to explain your code. I currently have no idea what these numbers mean because no units were attached to them. I would recommend looking at UASB-Design’s report to see how python analysis was done.
• [x] Line 280: Why is i.e. hyperlinked?

[cjmsmith]

@ananya-gangadhar was the formatting title thing supposed to be for UASB-Design? Because I think our title looks fine but I noticed theirs is wonky right now.