What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Run an image through tesseract
2. Scale the image by 3x, cubic interpolation in GIMP
3. Run the bigger image through tesseract
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
Step 1 produces garbage:
"Is very small The quesllon naturally zlrlscs. whethcr lhls dlsplacemenl IS"
Step 3 produces decent output:
"is very small. The question naturally arises whether this displacement is"
What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
3.02.02 on Windows
Please provide any additional information below.
We should not have to manually resize images, the tesseract software should
automatically internally resample the image to a suitable resolution before
running OCR on it.
Original issue reported on code.google.com by omegat...@gmail.com on 23 May 2014 at 11:55
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
omegat...@gmail.com
on 23 May 2014 at 11:55