[0.9] Individual should show that they were key contributor and example to team. This includes their participation in ideas, plans, creating individual issues, providing code commits to project, crossover grading participation, being on task and positive example in the classroom.
Individuals Video, Issue(s), Commits(s)
[0.9] Video in CPT caption style , includes Web demo of key contribution to project, 1 minute
[0.8] Issue(s) that show plans/progress to team objectives
[ 0.9] Highlights of key commit(s) in Issues, summarizes code contributions
[0.9] Review GitHub analytics for key commits in each weeks during the project, shows consistent participation for 3 weeks
Final Score: 0.875
Based on the code and explanations Tanav provided he played a very big role in his team's project. His video properly utilized the correct subtitles and CPT caption style. He also showed his contributions to the project successfully in under 1 minute. Throughout the project, he left multiple comments and committed issues explaining or summarizing his challenges or code contributions. His analytics were also very good because he had the second-highest number of commits in his team and all of his commits contained meaningful code that helped shape their team's final product.
Individuals Video, Issue(s), Commits(s)
[0.9] Video in CPT caption style , includes Web demo of key contribution to project, 1 minute
[0.8] Issue(s) that show plans/progress to team objectives
[ 0.9] Highlights of key commit(s) in Issues, summarizes code contributions
[0.9] Review GitHub analytics for key commits in each weeks during the project, shows consistent participation for 3 weeks
Final Score: 0.875
Based on the code and explanations Tanav provided he played a very big role in his team's project. His video properly utilized the correct subtitles and CPT caption style. He also showed his contributions to the project successfully in under 1 minute. Throughout the project, he left multiple comments and committed issues explaining or summarizing his challenges or code contributions. His analytics were also very good because he had the second-highest number of commits in his team and all of his commits contained meaningful code that helped shape their team's final product.