Week 3 Review Ticket-Christopher Hom

[Chom642]

Total Score 9.15/10 Grader: Ritvik Keerthi Github + Crossover Individual Github Crossover Github Individual Replit Crossover Replit

Individual Commits Replit runtime Video playlist

[Ritvik-Keerthi]

INDIVIDUAL SCORE: 9.15/10

Graded By: Ritvik Keerthi

Quality of work

Share link(s) on slack to final work: GitHub pages, Replit, Review Ticket(s), TimeBox, or other methods you have used to organize work.

Coding Review

Individual Coding:

• [x] GitHub Pages showing key learnings and challenges conquered from Tech Talks --> Has github pages that show key learnings and challenges conquered by tech talks clearly in 2nd video of playlist. {1/1}

• [ ] GitHub commits you have made, show GitHub insights into your code commits. --> Does not highlight github commits made by self, however, shows crossover work done. {0.75/1}

• [ ] Show Code running on Replit as well as IntelliJ --> Code runs on replit, however not shown on IntelliJ {0.75/1}

• [x] Menu review illustrating use of Lists and navigation: show runtime, code organization, code and comments --> Shows menu being run with the lists shown in main.py {1/1}

• [x] List and Loops: show runtime, code organization, code and comments --> Lists and loops file shown being run in video {1/1}

• [x] Class review and understanding: show runtime, code organization, code and comments --> Shows fibonacci class and explains how it works, shows code, comments, runtime, and is well organized {1/1}

• [x] Show Crossover contribution: Highlight work you did in crossover project: show their Replit runtime, code commit(s) in their GitHub repo. Show anything you have done to enhance what you have learned from Python code --> Explicitly done in first video, well done highlighting crossover commits as well as what has been done in crossover project. Fixed up a lot of work that needed to be, as well as added in own programs. {1/1}

Video 2 minutes: showing the above, quality suggested as follows

• [ ] Make sure you cover everything, but create your own order and optimize time --> As mentioned before, some things are missing, however most of it is there. {0.75/1}
• [x] Use Voice or Captions. Try not to wiggle mouse a lot or over scroll. Make sure you have a clear plan before you start. --> Voice is used and this video is clearly planned out into segments
• [x] Perform video in small parts 15-30 seconds and finish a key subject. Then put the final Video together with Video editing or Youtube playlists. --> Video is performed in parts < 30 seconds for the most part and focuses on key subjects. However, video could be cut up into more parts as one of the videos is closer to a minute than 30 seconds long. {0.9/1}

[Ritvik-Keerthi]

Akhil Algorithmic Review Ticket

Individual Coding:

• [x] GitHub Pages showing key learnings and challenges conquered from Tech Talks

• [x ] GitHub commits you have made, show GitHub insights into your code commits.

• [x] Show Code running on Replit as well as IntelliJ

• [x] Menu review illustrating use of Lists and navigation: show runtime, code organization, code and comments

• [x] List and Loops: show runtime, code organization, code and comments

• [x] Class review and understanding: show runtime, code organization, code and comments

• [x] Show Crossover contribution: Highlight work you did in crossover project: show their Replit runtime, code commit(s) in their GitHub repo. Show anything you have done to enhance what you have learned from Python code

Video 2 minutes: showing the above, quality suggested as follows

• [x] Make sure you cover everything, but create your own order and optimize time
• [x] Use Voice or Captions. Try not to wiggle mouse a lot or over scroll. Make sure you have a clear plan before you start.
• [x] Perform video in small parts 15-30 seconds and finish a key subject. Then put the final Video together with Video editing or Youtube playlists.

Akhil has everything required in the video, as it is very compelling and interesting to listen and watch. I think that something he could improve on would be the speed of talking in the vide, as he goes fast a little bit. Therefore, I would give him a 9.8/10.