Incorporate reviewer comments

AlasdairGray commented 6 years ago

Respond to review comments:

[x] R2: Paper framed on reproducibility crisis, but nothing being reproduced. Can the methods be reproduced by others. Is open science sufficient, i.e. open source and FAIR+open datasets)?
[x] R2: How can we ensure accessibility of data to future studies?
[ ] R2: Changing data suggests that reproducing other people's work may be challenging
[x] R2: Insufficient methodology to create environment. Provide dependencies file.
[ ] R2: Add blocks to test the connection of SPARQL endpoint prior to running queries
[x] R3: More references to other works that have used Jupyter Notebooks, e.g. astronomy work
[x] R3: Additional discussion on Semantic Web issues beyond just using endpoints. What extensions are needed to Jupyter to help reproducibility

AlasdairGray commented 6 years ago

Part of reviewer 2's comments solved in commit 64ae3d24d7de7fa83f76c899e7ed33114b50c446

AlasdairGray commented 6 years ago

I'm unaware of a standard way to test a SPARQL connection other than running a query over it, as is done by SPARQLES service

AlasdairGray / SemSci2018