search

AlecHawes / nullpomino

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/nullpomino
0 stars 0 forks source link

fieldHiddenHeight option for fair netplay #6

Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 8 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
Some options for netplay are required for fair play. Most notably, the 
fieldHiddenHeight option (0-3 or 20 in the rules provided) will affect players' 
fields depending on the value set in the rule settings.

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
Players fields should behave the same way after it is pushed above the visible 
height and then lowered later. Currently, this depends on the fieldHiddenHeight 
option where some players stack may be left intact if the value is large while 
others are chopped off if the value is small.

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
7.2.0 and latest svn

Original issue reported on code.google.com by prelude...@gmail.com on 15 Jul 2010 at 4:11

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
I'm not sure if this is issue. Rule free rooms allows players to edit different 
settings for their advantage, for example your rule may ignore delays (like 
standard-zero) or add more piece previews. Players should be aware of those 
possibilities when playing rule free rooms. For 100% fair play you should 
always create rooms with rule lock options.

Original comment by w.kowa...@gmail.com on 15 Jul 2010 at 10:29

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
I think it is a problem the rule system presents in general. It is definitely 
something we should keep in mind when retooling how things like that work.

Original comment by kitaru2...@gmail.com on 31 Jul 2010 at 7:17