Closed gforge closed 8 years ago
I am investigating the dok.unpack
option :)
Since #17 I think dok
is no longer a suitable solution. LDoc seems a good march for our needs.
I agree. I still feel though that named parameters are a good thing and I suggest we keep dok.unpack when the parameters are > 2
You have currently used a system similar to LDoc but it doesn't entirely follow those rules. It may be worth changing the syntax to something that provides an automated documentation for at least the API. Coming from R I'm used to using roxygen2 that handles this entire problem in an excellent fashion.
I also like the
dok.unpack
functionality and it basically takes care of all the documentation (except the return value). Ideally I would like to combine thedok.unpack
with LDoc but I guess that would require adding an LDoc extension. I'm pretty sure that there is some way of getting the torch/dok to generate documentation but for a documentation package it is surprisingly poorly documented.