AlexRogalskiy / java-patterns

πŸ† Java4You Design patterns
https://alexander-rogalsky.gitbook.io/java-patterns/
GNU General Public License v3.0
11 stars 4 forks source link

CVE-2024-34064 (Medium) detected in Jinja2-3.1.2-py3-none-any.whl #3400

Open mend-bolt-for-github[bot] opened 5 months ago

mend-bolt-for-github[bot] commented 5 months ago

CVE-2024-34064 - Medium Severity Vulnerability

Vulnerable Library - Jinja2-3.1.2-py3-none-any.whl

A very fast and expressive template engine.

Library home page: https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/bc/c3/f068337a370801f372f2f8f6bad74a5c140f6fda3d9de154052708dd3c65/Jinja2-3.1.2-py3-none-any.whl

Path to dependency file: /docs/requirements.txt

Path to vulnerable library: /docs/requirements.txt,/docs/requirements.txt,/tmp/ws-scm/java-patterns

Dependency Hierarchy: - :x: **Jinja2-3.1.2-py3-none-any.whl** (Vulnerable Library)

Found in base branch: master

Vulnerability Details

Jinja is an extensible templating engine. The `xmlattr` filter in affected versions of Jinja accepts keys containing non-attribute characters. XML/HTML attributes cannot contain spaces, `/`, `>`, or `=`, as each would then be interpreted as starting a separate attribute. If an application accepts keys (as opposed to only values) as user input, and renders these in pages that other users see as well, an attacker could use this to inject other attributes and perform XSS. The fix for CVE-2024-22195 only addressed spaces but not other characters. Accepting keys as user input is now explicitly considered an unintended use case of the `xmlattr` filter, and code that does so without otherwise validating the input should be flagged as insecure, regardless of Jinja version. Accepting _values_ as user input continues to be safe. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.4.

Publish Date: 2024-05-06

URL: CVE-2024-34064

CVSS 3 Score Details (5.4)

Base Score Metrics: - Exploitability Metrics: - Attack Vector: Network - Attack Complexity: Low - Privileges Required: None - User Interaction: Required - Scope: Unchanged - Impact Metrics: - Confidentiality Impact: Low - Integrity Impact: Low - Availability Impact: None

For more information on CVSS3 Scores, click here.

Suggested Fix

Type: Upgrade version

Origin: https://github.com/pallets/jinja/security/advisories/GHSA-h75v-3vvj-5mfj

Release Date: 2024-05-06

Fix Resolution: Jinja2 - 3.1.4


Step up your Open Source Security Game with Mend here

boring-cyborg[bot] commented 5 months ago

Thanks so much for opening up your first issue here on the repository! πŸŽ‰ We would like to warmly welcome you to the community behind the app! ☺️ We'll check in soon and have a look at your issue. In the meantime, you can check your issue and make sure it aligns with our contribution guidelines! Here's the comprehensive list:

Enhancements

An enhancement takes a feature and improves or alters its behaviour. Please make sure to argue how your proposition will aid non-technical text workers, and why it can't be emulated easily with other features or apps!

Feature requests

Feature requests introduce whole new features into the app. This requires a lot of work, so these might be turned down if the implementation costs supersede the benefits we expect to see from implementing it. Please do not be disappointed if that happens. It likely has nothing to do with your great request but simply with us and our missing resources! You can of course always ask someone to implement this feature, because a PR with a working new feature has much higher chances of being merged! :)

Bug reports

Please note that one of the main reasons for why bug reports cannot be addressed is that there's not enough information for us to find and fix the bug you describe, so make sure you try to pinpoint the bug as close as possible. The ideal bug report for us has two qualities:

  1. The bug is always reproducible, at least within a certain context. 2. We know exactly what specifically goes wrong, and there is consensus on what should happen instead.

Please note that if you encounter behaviour that does not align with your expectations of what would happen, this might as well be simply intended behaviour and we need to simply clarify why the behaviour is the way it is. This is not to be considered a bug and such issues may be closed! Suggest an enhancement instead! But now, have a great day and thank you again!

github-actions[bot] commented 5 months ago

πŸ‘‹ Thanks for reporting!