Closed xown1048 closed 6 months ago
Dear xown1048,
Thank you very much for using SPT. May I get the script you have used to run SPT and your log files? You can send them to my email at botlusaritas@health.ucsd.edu
Best wishes, Burcak
Dear Burcak,
I really appreciate your fast response and help!
I sent an email with the script and log files after the weekend just in case.
I just followed the github tutorial as much as I could.
If you have a request or question, please let me know.
Best, Taejoo
Dear Taejoo,
Could you please resend me your script and log files? Since I couldn't receive any email from you. Please send your files to botlusaritas@health.ucsd.edu and burcako@metu.edu.tr
Best, Burcak
Dear Burcak,
I really appreciate your help!
It's been fixed well after upgrading the tool (the latest version of SPT 1.0.89) as you suggested.
Sincerely thank you.
Thank you so much for developing a really useful and good tool and solving the issue.
Best, Taejoo
I'm happy that your issue is resolved. With this, I will close this issue. If you have any further questions, please let me know. Best wishes, Burcak
Dear developers,
Thank you for the really nice tool.
I couldn’t get the replication strand bias result.
I tried to run my own data and example data to validate whether I can get the replication strand bias result.
I couldn’t get the result in both cases.
I just follow the example running code.
Lagging_real_count and Leading_real_count were 0.
I also installed topography.install_nucleosome('GRCh37') topography.install_atac_seq('GRCh37’) topography.install_repli_seq('GRCh37') data.
python version = 3.8.7 SigProfilerTopography version = 1.0.87
I also tired it with num_of_sbs_required = 100.
Every results except for replication strand bias was obtained well.
Could you provide a solution? Is there any reason for it?