Directions for reviewers. Tell potential reviewers what kind of feedback you are soliciting.
Which areas should receive a particularly close look?
Most unexpected changes are from CNV alteration updates ( probably direct results of manta filtering update #1116) additional input/verification might be needed since it affects subtypes
Is there anything that you want to discuss further?
NA
Is the analysis in a mature enough form that the resulting figure(s) and/or table(s) are ready for review?
Yes
Results
What types of results are included (e.g., table, figure)?
Fusion_counts and Fusion_evidence was added to HGG sutypes output from #1094
lgat and hgat metadata results file are changed because of we removed the extra columns previous_cancer_predispositions previous_parent_aliquot_id #1079
Reproducibility Checklist
[x] The dependencies required to run the code in this pull request have been added to the project Dockerfile.
[x] This analysis has been added to continuous integration.
Documentation Checklist
[x] This analysis module has a README and it is up to date.
[x] This analysis is recorded in the table in analyses/README.md and the entry is up to date.
[x] The analytical code is documented and contains comments.
Purpose/implementation Section
What scientific question is your analysis addressing?
Run molecular subtyping for v20 release
What was your approach?
What GitHub issue does your pull request address?
1048
Directions for reviewers. Tell potential reviewers what kind of feedback you are soliciting.
Which areas should receive a particularly close look?
Is there anything that you want to discuss further?
NA
Is the analysis in a mature enough form that the resulting figure(s) and/or table(s) are ready for review?
Yes
Results
What types of results are included (e.g., table, figure)?
tables
What is your summary of the results?
Reproducibility Checklist
Documentation Checklist
README
and it is up to date.analyses/README.md
and the entry is up to date.