Closed komalsrathi closed 3 years ago
@jharenza can you review this when you get a chance? I wasn't sure if you got notified about it.
Yes, on my list for today!
@jharenza I have made the following changes:
1) updated some output file names to be consistent and more meaningful
2) updated ROC with shuffled/non-shuffled data + using simpsons
theme
3) updated README
Ok, just fixed it. It was using wilcox by default but had 3 levels which weren't showing up. Now I am using a condition to use kruskal test for > 2 levels here
I am not sure why the checks are failing, because it is running successfully on my local machine.
sorry @jaclyn-taroni - missed tagging you in this for the CI failure
I am not sure why the checks are failing, because it is running successfully on my local machine.
To narrow things down – running locally using the Docker image and the CI data?
I am not sure why the checks are failing, because it is running successfully on my local machine.
To narrow things down – running locally using the Docker image and the CI data?
No, I usually just run the bash script as is: cd OpenPBTA-analysis/analyses/tp53_nf1_score && bash run_classifier.sh
Based on the error:
Error: Column `shuffled` can't be modified because it's a grouping variable
I suspect the problem is this part of the code using the version of dplyr
on the project image:
@jaclyn-taroni ok I removed the unnecessary grouping I had in my code, all good now. Thanks!
Purpose/implementation Section
What scientific question is your analysis addressing?
Create and update plots for manuscript
What was your approach?
molecular_subtype == NA | molecular_subtype == To be classified
,sample count >= 3
andmolecular subtype count > 1
cancer_predispositions == NA
andtp53_score == NA
.theme_pubr
What GitHub issue does your pull request address?
https://github.com/AlexsLemonade/OpenPBTA-analysis/issues/1146
Directions for reviewers. Tell potential reviewers what kind of feedback you are soliciting.
Which areas should receive a particularly close look?
P-value files for TP53 comparison with molecular subtypes per broad histology
Output of 06-evaluate-classifier.py to be used for creating ROC curves in R
Is there anything that you want to discuss further?
Should we remove:
1) Old version of
Li-Fraumeni syndrome_tp53_scores.png
2) Old version of ROC plots that are now under
plots/
:Is the analysis in a mature enough form that the resulting figure(s) and/or table(s) are ready for review?
Yes
Results
What types of results are included (e.g., table, figure)?
Tables, figures as specified above
What is your summary of the results?
N/A
Reproducibility Checklist
Documentation Checklist
README
and it is up to date.analyses/README.md
and the entry is up to date.