Closed namansri468 closed 2 years ago
Thanks for getting started on this @namansri468! Some immediate feedback I have here is about the process of code review. We want to emphasize that the joint approval of "authority reviews code" and "automatic testing in circle CI" leads to merging code and manubot contribution.
Maybe something like adding a vertical arrow in between (?) authority/automatic, and then an arrow coming out from there annotated "code approved" going into next steps, as in attached. OpenPBTA_Flowchart_D3.pdf
Hi @sjspielman and @namansri468! Thanks for working on this. My one minor comment is that perhaps we should stay consistent with the repository and manuscript with text capitalization for "OpenPBTA" rather than "OPENPBTA". Thoughts?
Closing this PR after some in-house discussions about the direction for this figure. A new PR will be opened later.
Purpose/implementation Section
What scientific question is your analysis addressing?
This pull request is for the manuscript issue https://github.com/AlexsLemonade/OpenPBTA-manuscript/issues/83 to include a panel in figure 1 showing the workflow process. The icons used are all CCBY.
Some places to look: