Closed sjspielman closed 2 years ago
One question: should we retain the broad_histology label on the GSVA heatmap?
We did this to match UMAP, but I did find it harder to write about in the manuscript. However, the analysis is also done on broad histology. I think we can either retain broad histology labels and analysis, and add another annotation row for cancer group OR retain broad labels, run another analysis on cancer group and add the annotation for cancer group. I'll just have to update the text for the latter making sure the cancer groups' scores are significant, but it may be useful/easier to write to have the latter results and both labels (that'll require another legend).
This PR is now out of date given #1336. I'm going to convert this to a draft and block with the 5D panel.
Edit: Also blocking with #1337 which will update the GSVA analysis and figure use to cancer groups instead of broad histologies.
Noting the GSVA panel has been updated with cancer groups. But, this is now blocked by #1347. The figure will need to be recompiled once that is in.
@jharenza at long last this is ready again!
Note that as part of this I had to update the overall sizing for the quantiseq panel.
The immune-deconv
module of interest has passed CI so this can be merged in now.
Partially addresses issues #1321 and #1322 by updating Figure 5 panels and adding the compiled PDF and PNG.
This PR copies the updated Figure 5 panels into figures, adds a line in
generate_figures.sh
to perform the copying, and adds compiled Figure 5.One question: should we retain the
broad_histology
label on the GSVA heatmap?