Closed jharenza closed 2 years ago
Hm, so I think this should get rerun to reflect the expression value changes in the module but I don't think it needs to be done here in this stack. I will close.
Okay, I've rerun this in a separate branch and it seems like the differences in expression that I perceived were a matter of aspect ratio of the figure.
Purpose/implementation Section
What scientific question is your analysis addressing?
rerun chordoma subtyping
What was your approach?
What GitHub issue does your pull request address?
Directions for reviewers. Tell potential reviewers what kind of feedback you are soliciting.
Which areas should receive a particularly close look?
Is there anything that you want to discuss further?
Is the analysis in a mature enough form that the resulting figure(s) and/or table(s) are ready for review?
Results
What types of results are included (e.g., table, figure)?
What is your summary of the results?
no notable changes
Reproducibility Checklist
Documentation Checklist
README
and it is up to date.analyses/README.md
and the entry is up to date.