Closed jharenza closed 2 years ago
Yeah good point, will do. I was a little unsure how to add this since the dir structure is a bit different
Yes, didn't see that one, thanks!
@sjspielman ready for re-review. This was a very early module and so the readme doesn't explicity list every script and file as do others, so if we want to update, maybe @jashapiro can update that part. I updated more generally. In addition, I used a bash run script to be consistent with every other module.
Purpose/implementation Section
What scientific question is your analysis addressing?
The notebook added here records:
What was your approach?
Calculate the above from
cooccur_top50.ALL.tsv
andcooccur_top50.Diffuse-astrocytic-and-oligodendroglial-tumor.tsv
What GitHub issue does your pull request address?
This PR closes #1391
Directions for reviewers. Tell potential reviewers what kind of feedback you are soliciting.
Which areas should receive a particularly close look?
NA
Is there anything that you want to discuss further?
No
Is the analysis in a mature enough form that the resulting figure(s) and/or table(s) are ready for review?
yes
Results
What types of results are included (e.g., table, figure)?
notebook with results
What is your summary of the results?
These numbers match those in the manuscript
Reproducibility Checklist
Documentation Checklist
README
and it is up to date.analyses/README.md
and the entry is up to date.