Closed sjspielman closed 2 years ago
Something else I am realizing is that we may need to update Table S1 also (the histologies file), OR include docs for how to map "internal naming" back to the naming used in the manuscript, for when broad_histology != broad_histology_display. If we want to consider doing that I can add that into this PR.
I think we should probably leave S1 as is, but I agree about adding in documentation about the groups. If Table S1 is the only place that we use the broad_histology
values, we might note it in the caption for that table.
Something else I am realizing is that we may need to update Table S1 also (the histologies file), OR include docs for how to map "internal naming" back to the naming used in the manuscript, for when broad_histology != broad_histology_display. If we want to consider doing that I can add that into this PR.
I think we should probably leave S1 as is, but I agree about adding in documentation about the groups. If Table S1 is the only place that we use the
broad_histology
values, we might note it in the caption for that table.
We can also possibly link to the palette file somewhere in the STAR methods?
Closes #1553
This PR updates Table 1 to use
broad_histology_display
for the heading. I updated the table notebook to read in and incorporate the palette file and re-ran the notebook. The output column now says "broad_histology_display" which I think is appropriate because the values indeed differ from "broad_histology."Something else I am realizing is that we may need to update Table S1 also (the histologies file), OR include docs for how to map "internal naming" back to the naming used in the manuscript, for when broad_histology != broad_histology_display. If we want to consider doing that I can add that into this PR.