Closed sjspielman closed 1 year ago
I think it would be nice to add Panel A to the manuscript, and the remaining panels (along with A as the multi-panel figure @jaclyn-taroni suggested) to the reviewer response. Can we add this as Supp Figure 3A, perhaps splitting the space with the oncoprint, making that B and so on?
Towards #1665
This PR updates three modules, including code and docs, to export plots that can be used towards the tumor purity SI figure. As proposed in #1665, these are (with nested bullets indicating relevant changed files) -
Panel A distribution of tumor purity by cancer group:
analyses/tumor-purity-exploration/plots/cancer_group_tumor_fraction.pdf
analyses/tumor-purity-exploration/01_explore-tumor-purity.Rmd
and htmlanalyses/tumor-purity-exploration/README.md
Panel D remake UMAP with high purity tumors only:
analyses/transcriptomic-dimension-reduction/plots/umap_tumor-purity-threshold.pdf
analyses/transcriptomic-dimension-reduction/analyses/transcriptomic-dimension-reduction/06-umap-tumor-purity-threshold.Rmd
and htmlanalyses/transcriptomic-dimension-reduction/README.md
Panel E quanTIseq estimations of immune fractions across cancer groups:
analyses/immune-deconv/plots/tumor-purity-threshold_quantiseq-cancer-groups.pdf
analyses/immune-deconv/03-quantiseq-at-threshold.Rmd
and htmlanalyses/immune-deconv/README.md