AlexsLemonade / OpenPBTA-manuscript

The manuscript repository for the Open Pediatric Brain Tumor Atlas Project
Other
13 stars 26 forks source link

Update FDA/website references #310

Closed jharenza closed 2 years ago

jharenza commented 2 years ago

From this comment, there are a few website references which we should update:

Hi @jashapiro - these changes look good. The Cell format and biorxiv changes look as expected.

I did notice some other refs we will want to update, but do not need to do it here and I can put this into a new ticket. Perhaps, if any, you can update the two arxiv references here.

https://paperpile.com/s/cell-citation-style/

Originally posted by @jharenza in https://github.com/AlexsLemonade/OpenPBTA-manuscript/pull/308#pullrequestreview-1071423100

jashapiro commented 2 years ago

Tracking from the previous thread:

NA author, remove NA &NA; (2012). FDA Approves Pediatric Formulation of Afinitor for Children with Subependymal Giant Cell Astrocytoma. Oncology Times 34, 22. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.cot.0000421359.88140.a8.

Should we change this to link to an FDA page as well, for consistency? Or can we cite all of these from a meta-source like https://www.fda.gov/about-fda/oncology-center-excellence/pediatric-oncology-drug-approvals?

I think I would prefer to merge all of the citations in this paragraph into one for conciseness. The pediatric drug approval database above seems the most logical to me. I guess a remaining question is whether we would want to trim the paragraph to not name each of the drugs, or leave it as is. Thoughts on this @jharenza ?

jharenza commented 2 years ago

I think I would prefer to merge all of the citations in this paragraph into one for conciseness. The pediatric drug approval database above seems the most logical to me.

Fine by me!

I guess a remaining question is whether we would want to trim the paragraph to not name each of the drugs, or leave it as is.

I had this question from someone else, but prefer they stay. This section was also reviewed by a neurosurgeon and we concluded to let's see if any of the domain experts want to trim this when we send it out. I think it is good information to have at a glance, esp if we remove the specific links.

jashapiro commented 2 years ago

Most of this was completed with #321, with the remaining updates, I think, limited to the issue copied to #358