Closed jharenza closed 2 years ago
Tracking from the previous thread:
NA author, remove NA &NA; (2012). FDA Approves Pediatric Formulation of Afinitor for Children with Subependymal Giant Cell Astrocytoma. Oncology Times 34, 22. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.cot.0000421359.88140.a8.
Should we change this to link to an FDA page as well, for consistency? Or can we cite all of these from a meta-source like https://www.fda.gov/about-fda/oncology-center-excellence/pediatric-oncology-drug-approvals?
I think I would prefer to merge all of the citations in this paragraph into one for conciseness. The pediatric drug approval database above seems the most logical to me. I guess a remaining question is whether we would want to trim the paragraph to not name each of the drugs, or leave it as is. Thoughts on this @jharenza ?
I think I would prefer to merge all of the citations in this paragraph into one for conciseness. The pediatric drug approval database above seems the most logical to me.
Fine by me!
I guess a remaining question is whether we would want to trim the paragraph to not name each of the drugs, or leave it as is.
I had this question from someone else, but prefer they stay. This section was also reviewed by a neurosurgeon and we concluded to let's see if any of the domain experts want to trim this when we send it out. I think it is good information to have at a glance, esp if we remove the specific links.
Most of this was completed with #321, with the remaining updates, I think, limited to the issue copied to #358
From this comment, there are a few website references which we should update:
Hi @jashapiro - these changes look good. The Cell format and biorxiv changes look as expected.
I did notice some other refs we will want to update, but do not need to do it here and I can put this into a new ticket. Perhaps, if any, you can update the two arxiv references here.
https://paperpile.com/s/cell-citation-style/
Website link only - I think this one should possibly be a link within the text PNOC008: A Pilot Trial Testing the Clinical Benefit of Using Molecular Profiling to Determine an Individualized Treatment Plan in Children and Young Adults with High Grade Glioma (Excluding Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma) – Pacific Pediatric Neuro-Oncology Consortium.
Author to add:
National Cancer Institute
(2008). Childhood Medulloblastoma and Other Central Nervous System Embryonal Tumors Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version - NCI.~~Author to add:
The St. Jude Children's Research Hospital–Washington University Pediatric Cancer Genome Project.
(2014). The genomic landscape of diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma and pediatric non-brainstem high-grade glioma. Nat Genet 46, 444–450. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2938.~~NA
author, remove NA &NA; (2012). FDA Approves Pediatric Formulation of Afinitor for Children with Subependymal Giant Cell Astrocytoma. Oncology Times 34, 22. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.cot.0000421359.88140.a8.Should these have titles un-hyperlinked and have direct web links if a website and not a paper?? Assuming this happens if we did not use doi
A few refs have html italic/superscript tags, not sure if that is an issue, just pointing out here:
~~This one has some odd author attributes, probably needs a manual update Justin Guinney [Aut, Cre], Robert Castelo [Aut], Joan Fernandez[Ctb] (2017). GSVA. https://doi.org/10.18129/b9.bioc.gsva.~~
Originally posted by @jharenza in https://github.com/AlexsLemonade/OpenPBTA-manuscript/pull/308#pullrequestreview-1071423100