AlgoGenesis is a centralized open-source platform dedicated to providing optimized and well-documented algorithm implementations in C. Perfect for both beginners and advanced users, this repository serves as a comprehensive learning resource for solving algorithmic challenges.
MIT License
33
stars
87
forks
source link
[UPDATE ALGORITHM] adding more sorting algorithms #243
Please describe the changes you want to make to the existing algorithm and why they are necessary.
Checklist:
[x] Contributor in GSSoC-ext
[x] Want to work on it
Affected Algorithm:
Mention which algorithm you want to update and the specific directory where you want to change.
Additional Information:
Any extra details or suggestions related to the update.
Research Existing Algorithms: Familiarize yourself with well-known sorting algorithms (e.g., Quick Sort, Merge Sort, Bubble Sort) to understand their properties and limitations.
Choose the Algorithm Type: Decide on the type of sorting algorithm based on the use case:
Comparison-based: (e.g., Bubble Sort, Quick Sort)
Non-comparison-based: (e.g., Counting Sort, Radix Sort)
Design the Algorithm: Outline the specific steps and logic for the new sorting method. Consider algorithm complexity (e.g., average and worst-case time complexity).
Implementation: Code the sorting algorithm in your chosen programming language. Ensure it adheres to coding standards for maintainability.
Test the Algorithm: Validate the algorithm with various datasets, including:
Random data
Sorted data
Reversely sorted data
Edge cases (e.g., empty arrays, arrays with identical elements)
Optimize: Analyze performance through benchmarking. Optimize for speed and memory usage.
Document: Provide clear documentation outlining how the algorithm works, its time complexity, best use cases, and limitations.
Integrate: Combine the new sorting method into existing systems, ensuring it integrates well with other functionalities.
Monitor Performance: After integration, monitor the algorithm’s performance to identify any issues or areas for improvement.
Popular Sorting Algorithms to Consider:
Quick Sort:
Divide-and-conquer algorithm.
Average time complexity of O(n log n).
In-place sorting.
Merge Sort:
Also a divide-and-conquer algorithm.
Stable and excels in worst-case scenarios at O(n log n).
Requires additional space.
Insertion Sort:
Efficient for small datasets and nearly sorted arrays.
Time complexity of O(n²) in the average and worst case but O(n) in the best case.
Heap Sort:
Based on a comparison-based binary heap data structure.
Time complexity of O(n log n).
In-place but not stable.
Counting Sort:
Non-comparison-based sorting algorithm.
Efficient for sorting integers or objects within a known range.
Time complexity of O(n + k), where k is the range of the input.
Radix Sort:
A non-comparison-based algorithm that processes individual digits.
Time complexity of O(nk), where k is the number of digits.
Bucket Sort:
Distributes elements into several "buckets" and sort each bucket individually.
Time complexity of O(n + k) but works best with uniform distribution.
By following these steps and methodologies, you can effectively design, implement, and integrate new sorting algorithms into your projects.
Description:
Please describe the changes you want to make to the existing algorithm and why they are necessary.
Checklist:
Affected Algorithm:
Mention which algorithm you want to update and the specific directory where you want to change.
Additional Information:
Any extra details or suggestions related to the update. Research Existing Algorithms: Familiarize yourself with well-known sorting algorithms (e.g., Quick Sort, Merge Sort, Bubble Sort) to understand their properties and limitations.
Choose the Algorithm Type: Decide on the type of sorting algorithm based on the use case:
Comparison-based: (e.g., Bubble Sort, Quick Sort) Non-comparison-based: (e.g., Counting Sort, Radix Sort) Design the Algorithm: Outline the specific steps and logic for the new sorting method. Consider algorithm complexity (e.g., average and worst-case time complexity).
Implementation: Code the sorting algorithm in your chosen programming language. Ensure it adheres to coding standards for maintainability.
Test the Algorithm: Validate the algorithm with various datasets, including:
Random data Sorted data Reversely sorted data Edge cases (e.g., empty arrays, arrays with identical elements) Optimize: Analyze performance through benchmarking. Optimize for speed and memory usage.
Document: Provide clear documentation outlining how the algorithm works, its time complexity, best use cases, and limitations.
Integrate: Combine the new sorting method into existing systems, ensuring it integrates well with other functionalities.
Monitor Performance: After integration, monitor the algorithm’s performance to identify any issues or areas for improvement.
Popular Sorting Algorithms to Consider: Quick Sort:
Divide-and-conquer algorithm. Average time complexity of O(n log n). In-place sorting. Merge Sort:
Also a divide-and-conquer algorithm. Stable and excels in worst-case scenarios at O(n log n). Requires additional space. Insertion Sort:
Efficient for small datasets and nearly sorted arrays. Time complexity of O(n²) in the average and worst case but O(n) in the best case. Heap Sort:
Based on a comparison-based binary heap data structure. Time complexity of O(n log n). In-place but not stable. Counting Sort:
Non-comparison-based sorting algorithm. Efficient for sorting integers or objects within a known range. Time complexity of O(n + k), where k is the range of the input. Radix Sort:
A non-comparison-based algorithm that processes individual digits. Time complexity of O(nk), where k is the number of digits. Bucket Sort:
Distributes elements into several "buckets" and sort each bucket individually. Time complexity of O(n + k) but works best with uniform distribution. By following these steps and methodologies, you can effectively design, implement, and integrate new sorting algorithms into your projects.