Closed kprokofi closed 2 years ago
96.1% is not bad.
in any case, i trained with: --learning_rate=5e-5 --batch_size=128
so i think you need lower learning rates. play a bit with larger batches, and reduced learning rates.
please share your code and training params once you are able to reproduce the results
Hi, thanks for your work. I tried to reproduce the results on the VOC dataset. I added the dataset to your code. This is my fork. I also added Timm wrapper to use timm models
I follow the article's recommendations and run the following command: python train.py --data /path/to/voc --model-name tresnet_l --num-classes 20 --batch-size 48 --lr 2e-4
I achieved only 96.1 % with tresnet_l (Q2L level)
Could you, please, help me to reproduce your results from the article ( 96.6 % ). Have you trained it with a larger batch size?