Open crcrewso opened 2 years ago
Thank you for the suggestions. 1-2. I have to admit that measurement is basic, probably I shall do it more advanced and consider your suggestions.
I hope this dataset works as a starting example.
Thank you,
I don't see an issue with sorting. After 'play' button on 3D animation panel was pressed -- there is an attempt to sort by acquisition time if possible, if not -- there are other attempts to sort. It may work or not. In particular case sorting by acquisition time works well. The order of images on the right side doesn't matter. See video:
I have checked it again and printed the order of animation.
The order is:
Acq. date | Acq. time | Phase |
---|---|---|
2021.09.15 | 16:24:23.241000 | 20% |
2021.09.15 | 16:24:23.641000 | 30% |
2021.09.15 | 16:24:24.041000 | 40% |
2021.09.15 | 16:24:24.441000 | 50% |
2021.09.15 | 16:24:24.841000 | 60% |
2021.09.15 | 16:24:25.241000 | 70% |
2021.09.15 | 16:24:25.641000 | 80% |
2021.09.15 | 16:24:26.041000 | 90% |
2021.09.15 | 16:24:26.441000 | 0% |
2021.09.15 | 16:24:26.841000 | 10% |
I don't see any tag to sort by phase %, it is mentioned in series description and image comment, maybe somewhere in private Siemens CSA binary data, but i can not rely on this. Maybe i don't see some attribute, let me know if you see one.
About sorting in the right side widget -- I will not change it, there is sorting by image id, how images are loaded or deleted is not known and doesn't matter.
In fact every slice in series has own acquisition date/time, i take the first slice after IPP/IOP sorting, it is not necessary the earliest, but it is consistent, AFAIK. I shall check later, maybe there is some improvement possible, e.g. to take the earliest one, i don't think it can change the order, but i shall look at it.