Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
If the user is sure that USER_FILE_UFS_TIER_ENABLED has never been turned on, then there is no need to delete nonexistent ufs block
Describe the solution you'd like
Add a config check in handleSuccess of PersistenceChecker to avoid UnderFileSystemUtils.deleteFileIfExists ufs block. This will cause list operations in object file system as amazon s3, or delete it directly without checking for existence
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed in two weeks if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. If the user is sure that USER_FILE_UFS_TIER_ENABLED has never been turned on, then there is no need to delete nonexistent ufs block
Describe the solution you'd like Add a config check in handleSuccess of PersistenceChecker to avoid UnderFileSystemUtils.deleteFileIfExists ufs block. This will cause list operations in object file system as amazon s3, or delete it directly without checking for existence