search

AlphaBetaTest / agrovoc-cs-workbench

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/agrovoc-cs-workbench
0 stars 0 forks source link

Representation of string to string relationships #450

Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. String to string relationships like has singular, has plural and has 
spelling variant are not included in relationships category

2. It's difficult for the user to locate these relationships.
3. If some one wants to add relationship 'has singular' they need to go to 
click on term and on the notes of the term where they can find this relation-  
which is really tedious and confusing

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?

Please use labels and text to provide additional information.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by lavanyak...@gmail.com on 12 Oct 2010 at 10:49

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Please find an example case below

go to term 'Andosols '. it has spelling varient 'Andisols'- to locate this 
relationhip you need to go through several steps.

Go to term 'andosols', click on note , then u will find this relation. 
A new user can't find this unless they know this hidden steps.

Original comment by lavanyak...@gmail.com on 2 Nov 2010 at 11:00

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by ahsan.mo...@gmail.com on 3 Nov 2010 at 8:01

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
The solution here is not necessarily so clear. To my mind there are two things:
1) "Notes" is not a very clear label. Maybe something like "Values" would be 
clearer.
2) It would be better to have only two tabs when one clicks on a term: one tab 
is history, the other tab shows relationships, attributes and notes so users 
could see everything at a glance. This would be the default tab instead of 
history tab.

Original comment by yjaq...@gmail.com on 26 Nov 2010 at 9:53

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Issue 444 has been merged into this issue.

Original comment by yjaq...@gmail.com on 26 Nov 2010 at 1:19

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by yjaq...@gmail.com on 26 Nov 2010 at 3:39

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Here is the explanation, to give the clear idea

In Relationship browser, if you select datatype properties you will be able to 
see these 2 top properties with sub properties
- Term domain datatype property (en)
        - Has term type (en)
- Term editorial datatype property (en)
        - Codes (en)
            - Has AGROVOC term code (en)
            - Has ASC code (en)
            - Has ASFA code (en)
            - Has code in the schema FAO Priority Area (en)
            - Has FAO term code (en)
            - Has fishery 3 alpha code (en)
            - Has ISO 3 country code (en)
            - Has taxonomic code (en)
        - scope notes (en)
            - Spelling variations (en)
            - Has plural (en)
            - Has singular (en)
            - Has spelling variant (en)
            - Has stemmed form (en)

Notes tab: It will include all the sub properties of Term editorial datatype 
property (en)

Attributes tab: It will include all the sub properties of Term domain datatype 
property (en)

To make the WB more generic, following model was adopted, so that if we add 
more properties under above 2 top properties, it will be automatically visible 
in the WB without need of extra work.

Option 1: Change "Notes" to "Values" will be like changing only the text 
labels. 

Effort: 1 man hr

Option 2: Only 2 tabs, History and Relationships (including relationships, 
notes, attributes)

Relationships tab: It is Term-Term relationships.
Notes/Attributes tab: It is Term-Literal value relationship.
Considering above, the method of taking input are different.

Complexity: This thing will be used in Concept and Classification module as 
well.

Original comment by pmshres...@gmail.com on 13 Dec 2010 at 6:11

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by sachit.r...@gmail.com on 7 Feb 2011 at 4:57

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by gudrun.j...@fao.org on 7 Mar 2011 at 10:18

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by yjaq...@gmail.com on 10 Mar 2011 at 11:52