position of nelwy added concept in case of flat list - biotech glossary

[GoogleCodeExporter]

biotech glossary has now a top concept (biotechglossary), and a long list of 
children. 

When adding a new concept to this, the list of possibilities allowed should be 
constrainted appropriately. Revise both cases: a concept is selected, no 
concept is selected. 

Also consider the possibility of removing top concept biotechglossary (which in 
fact shouldnt be there). IN previous conversation there seemed to be a 
performance issue... redescuss and fix. 

v1.2 sandbox

What steps will reproduce the problem?
1.
2.
3.

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?

Please provide any additional information below.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by webb.c...@gmail.com on 27 Jun 2011 at 8:49

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by ahsan.mo...@gmail.com on 30 Jun 2011 at 9:14

• Changed state: Accepted
• Added labels: Milestone-1.3, Priority-High, AssignedTo-Sachit

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by sachit.r...@gmail.com on 21 Jul 2011 at 3:20

• Added labels: Effort-3d

[GoogleCodeExporter]

As we agree to remove top concept biotech glossary, we will wait until the 
latest version will be sent by the Bioglossary team to VocBench team. Then the 
conversion will be done by Sachit.

Original comment by sachit.r...@gmail.com on 30 Aug 2011 at 3:50

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by sachit.r...@gmail.com on 21 Sep 2011 at 4:42

• Changed state: Fixed

[GoogleCodeExporter]

It works fine is no concept is selected. If a concept is selected, and I click 
on "add concept" I again get the choice between: child of the selected concept, 
same level as... , top level concept. 

Original comment by caterina...@gmail.com on 14 Oct 2011 at 10:57

• Changed state: Started

[GoogleCodeExporter]

It works fine is no concept is selected. If a concept is selected, and I click 
on "add concept" I again get the choice between: child of the selected concept, 
same level as... , top level concept. 

Original comment by caterina...@gmail.com on 14 Oct 2011 at 10:57

[GoogleCodeExporter]

We are trying to keep VocBench as generic as possible so that it can be used to 
manage any kind of vocabulary. As biotech have flat structure, we should choose 
only top level concept but in case of AGROVOC which have multiple hierarchy we 
will need to choose among (top level, child of, same as) based on the 
situation. So, it won't be good idea to restrict the choice of level of concept 
based on the ontology. I think it would be better to instruct the biotech users 
to always choose top level concepts as the biotech glossary have flat 
hierarchal structure. Please suggest.

Original comment by sachit.r...@gmail.com on 17 Oct 2011 at 7:50

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Sachit - We are trying to keep VocBench as generic as possible so that it can 
be used to manage any kind of vocabulary. As biotech have flat structure, we 
should choose only top level concept but in case of AGROVOC which have multiple 
hierarchy we will need to choose among (top level, child of, same as) based on 
the situation. So, it won't be good idea to restrict the choice of level of 
concept based on the ontology. I think it would be better to instruct the 
biotech users to always choose top level concepts as the biotech glossary have 
flat hierarchal structure. Please suggest.

Original comment by yjaq...@gmail.com on 17 Oct 2011 at 10:42

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Yes I think we can live with this - the main problem was to show the full list 
of concepts, so as long as we have removed the top-level biotech concept (which 
was anyhow poor modelling of the domain) we should be okay. Hopefully speed 
will be acceptable!

Original comment by yjaq...@gmail.com on 17 Oct 2011 at 10:44

• Changed state: WontFix